<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Years And Makes Are Good For Used Harleys?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://harleyds.com/wpress/6296/what-years-and-makes-are-good-for-used-harleys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://harleyds.com/wpress/6296/what-years-and-makes-are-good-for-used-harleys/</link>
	<description>Harley Davidson Bikes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:18:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: oh no you di'int</title>
		<link>http://harleyds.com/wpress/6296/what-years-and-makes-are-good-for-used-harleys/comment-page-1/#comment-2474</link>
		<dc:creator>oh no you di'int</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harleyds.com/wpress/what-years-and-makes-are-good-for-used-harleys#comment-2474</guid>
		<description>ah.. none</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah.. none</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrrysimm</title>
		<link>http://harleyds.com/wpress/6296/what-years-and-makes-are-good-for-used-harleys/comment-page-1/#comment-2473</link>
		<dc:creator>jrrysimm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harleyds.com/wpress/what-years-and-makes-are-good-for-used-harleys#comment-2473</guid>
		<description>i like EVO motors</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like EVO motors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evo80</title>
		<link>http://harleyds.com/wpress/6296/what-years-and-makes-are-good-for-used-harleys/comment-page-1/#comment-2472</link>
		<dc:creator>Evo80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harleyds.com/wpress/what-years-and-makes-are-good-for-used-harleys#comment-2472</guid>
		<description>I own a 1942 a 1955 and a 2002. In the past I&#039;ve owend 1967, 1974, 1973, 1962 and 1989. They are all good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own <a href="http://harleyds.com/wpress/" harley davidson>a</a> 1942 <a href="http://harleyds.com/wpress/" harley davidson>a</a> 1955 <a href="http://harleyds.com/sitemap" harley davidson>and</a> <a href="http://harleyds.com/wpress/" harley davidson>a</a> 2002. In <a href="http://harleyds.com/sitemap" harley davidson>the</a> past I&#8217;ve owend 1967, 1974, 1973, 1962 <a href="http://harleyds.com/sitemap" harley davidson>and</a> 1989. They are all good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: don c</title>
		<link>http://harleyds.com/wpress/6296/what-years-and-makes-are-good-for-used-harleys/comment-page-1/#comment-2471</link>
		<dc:creator>don c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harleyds.com/wpress/what-years-and-makes-are-good-for-used-harleys#comment-2471</guid>
		<description>Anything 1984 or newer. Note 1984 has an enclosed chain vs a belt drive (which started in 1985). I have owned 3 and as long as you take care of them Evo&#039;s are very dependable motors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Anything" href="http://harleyds.com/wpress/tag/anything/">Anything</a> 1984 or newer. Note 1984 has an enclosed chain vs <a href="http://harleyds.com/wpress/" harley davidson>a</a> belt drive (which started in 1985). I have owned 3 <a href="http://harleyds.com/sitemap" harley davidson>and</a> <a href="http://harleyds.com/wpress/" harley davidson>as</a> long <a href="http://harleyds.com/wpress/" harley davidson>as</a> <a href="http://harleyds.com/wpress/" harley davidson>you</a> take care of them Evo&#8217;s are very dependable motors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://harleyds.com/wpress/6296/what-years-and-makes-are-good-for-used-harleys/comment-page-1/#comment-2470</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harleyds.com/wpress/what-years-and-makes-are-good-for-used-harleys#comment-2470</guid>
		<description>I would stick with anything over 1999, as these models have the twin cam engine. I have seen many with well over 100,000 miles on them, my 2002 has 45,000 (never been opened)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would stick with <a title="anything" href="http://harleyds.com/wpress/tag/anything/">anything</a> over 1999, <a href="http://harleyds.com/wpress/" harley davidson>as</a> these models have <a href="http://harleyds.com/sitemap" harley davidson>the</a> twin cam engine. I have seen many with well over 100,000 miles on them, my 2002 has 45,000 (never been opened)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
